RabbitMQ tutorial - Remote procedure call (RPC)

Remote procedure call (RPC)

(using the Bunny client)

info

Prerequisites

This tutorial assumes RabbitMQ is installed and running on localhost on the standard port (5672). In case you use a different host, port or credentials, connections settings would require adjusting.

Where to get help

If you're having trouble going through this tutorial you can contact us through the mailing list or RabbitMQ community Slack.

In the second tutorial we learned how to use Work Queues to distribute time-consuming tasks among multiple workers.

But what if we need to run a function on a remote computer and wait for the result? Well, that's a different story. This pattern is commonly known as Remote Procedure Call or RPC.

In this tutorial we're going to use RabbitMQ to build an RPC system: a client and a scalable RPC server. As we don't have any time-consuming tasks that are worth distributing, we're going to create a dummy RPC service that returns Fibonacci numbers.

Client interface

To illustrate how an RPC service could be used we're going to create a simple client class. It's going to expose a method named call which sends an RPC request and blocks until the answer is received:

client = FibonacciClient.new('rpc_queue')

puts ' [x] Requesting fib(30)'
response = client.call(30)

puts " [.] Got #{response}"

A note on RPC

Although RPC is a pretty common pattern in computing, it's often criticised. The problems arise when a programmer is not aware whether a function call is local or if it's a slow RPC. Confusions like that result in an unpredictable system and adds unnecessary complexity to debugging. Instead of simplifying software, misused RPC can result in unmaintainable spaghetti code.

Bearing that in mind, consider the following advice:

• Make sure it's obvious which function call is local and which is remote.
• Document your system. Make the dependencies between components clear.
• Handle error cases. How should the client react when the RPC server is down for a long time?

When in doubt avoid RPC. If you can, you should use an asynchronous pipeline - instead of RPC-like blocking, results are asynchronously pushed to a next computation stage.

Callback queue

In general doing RPC over RabbitMQ is easy. A client sends a request message and a server replies with a response message. In order to receive a response we need to send a 'callback' queue address with the request. We can use the default queue. Let's try it:

queue = channel.queue('', exclusive: true)
exchange = channel.default_exchange

exchange.publish(message, routing_key: 'rpc_queue', reply_to: queue.name)

# ... then code to read a response message from the callback_queue ...

Message properties

The AMQP 0-9-1 protocol predefines a set of 14 properties that go with a message. Most of the properties are rarely used, with the exception of the following:

• :persistent: Marks a message as persistent (with a value of true) or transient (false). You may remember this property from the second tutorial.
• :content_type: Used to describe the mime-type of the encoding. For example for the often used JSON encoding it is a good practice to set this property to: application/json.
• :reply_to: Commonly used to name a callback queue.
• :correlation_id: Useful to correlate RPC responses with requests.

Correlation Id

In the method presented above we suggest creating a callback queue for every RPC request. That's pretty inefficient, but fortunately there is a better way - let's create a single callback queue per client.

That raises a new issue, having received a response in that queue it's not clear to which request the response belongs. That's when the :correlation_id property is used. We're going to set it to a unique value for every request. Later, when we receive a message in the callback queue we'll look at this property, and based on that we'll be able to match a response with a request. If we see an unknown :correlation_id value, we may safely discard the message - it doesn't belong to our requests.

You may ask, why should we ignore unknown messages in the callback queue, rather than failing with an error? It's due to a possibility of a race condition on the server side. Although unlikely, it is possible that the RPC server will die just after sending us the answer, but before sending an acknowledgment message for the request. If that happens, the restarted RPC server will process the request again. That's why on the client we must handle the duplicate responses gracefully, and the RPC should ideally be idempotent.

Summary

Our RPC will work like this:

• When the Client starts up, it creates an anonymous exclusive callback queue.
• For an RPC request, the Client sends a message with two properties: :reply_to, which is set to the callback queue and :correlation_id, which is set to a unique value for every request.
• The request is sent to an rpc_queue queue.
• The RPC worker (aka: server) is waiting for requests on that queue. When a request appears, it does the job and sends a message with the result back to the Client, using the queue from the :reply_to field.
• The client waits for data on the callback queue. When a message appears, it checks the :correlation_id property. If it matches the value from the request it returns the response to the application.

Putting it all together

The Fibonacci task:

def fibonacci(value)
  return value if value.zero? || value == 1

  fibonacci(value - 1) + fibonacci(value - 2)
end

We declare our fibonacci function. It assumes only valid positive integer input. (Don't expect this one to work for big numbers, and it's probably the slowest recursive implementation possible).

The code for our RPC server rpc_server.rb looks like this:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'bunny'

class FibonacciServer
  def initialize
    @connection = Bunny.new
    @connection.start
    @channel = @connection.create_channel
  end

  def start(queue_name)
    @queue = channel.queue(queue_name)
    @exchange = channel.default_exchange
    subscribe_to_queue
  end

  def stop
    channel.close
    connection.close
  end

  def loop_forever
    # This loop only exists to keep the main thread
    # alive. Many real world apps won't need this.
    loop { sleep 5 }
  end

  private

  attr_reader :channel, :exchange, :queue, :connection

  def subscribe_to_queue
    queue.subscribe do |_delivery_info, properties, payload|
      result = fibonacci(payload.to_i)

      exchange.publish(
        result.to_s,
        routing_key: properties.reply_to,
        correlation_id: properties.correlation_id
      )
    end
  end

  def fibonacci(value)
    return value if value.zero? || value == 1

    fibonacci(value - 1) + fibonacci(value - 2)
  end
end

begin
  server = FibonacciServer.new

  puts ' [x] Awaiting RPC requests'
  server.start('rpc_queue')
  server.loop_forever
rescue Interrupt => _
  server.stop
end

The server code is rather straightforward:

• As usual we start by establishing the connection, channel and declaring the queue.
• We might want to run more than one server process. In order to spread the load equally over multiple servers we need to set the prefetch setting on channel.
• We use Bunny::Queue#subscribe to consume messages from the queue. The consumer will wait for deliveries to be pushed to it, do the work and send the response back.

The code for our RPC client rpc_client.rb:

#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'bunny'
require 'thread'

class FibonacciClient
  attr_accessor :call_id, :response, :lock, :condition, :connection,
                :channel, :server_queue_name, :reply_queue, :exchange

  def initialize(server_queue_name)
    @connection = Bunny.new(automatically_recover: false)
    @connection.start

    @channel = connection.create_channel
    @exchange = channel.default_exchange
    @server_queue_name = server_queue_name

    setup_reply_queue
  end

  def call(n)
    @call_id = generate_uuid

    exchange.publish(n.to_s,
                     routing_key: server_queue_name,
                     correlation_id: call_id,
                     reply_to: reply_queue.name)

    # wait for the signal to continue the execution
    lock.synchronize { condition.wait(lock) }

    response
  end

  def stop
    channel.close
    connection.close
  end

  private

  def setup_reply_queue
    @lock = Mutex.new
    @condition = ConditionVariable.new
    that = self
    @reply_queue = channel.queue('', exclusive: true)

    reply_queue.subscribe do |_delivery_info, properties, payload|
      if properties[:correlation_id] == that.call_id
        that.response = payload.to_i

        # sends the signal to continue the execution of #call
        that.lock.synchronize { that.condition.signal }
      end
    end
  end

  def generate_uuid
    # very naive but good enough for code examples
    "#{rand}#{rand}#{rand}"
  end
end

client = FibonacciClient.new('rpc_queue')

puts ' [x] Requesting fib(30)'
response = client.call(30)

puts " [.] Got #{response}"

client.stop

Now is a good time to take a look at our full example source code (which includes basic exception handling) for rpc_client.rb and rpc_server.rb.

Our RPC service is now ready. We can start the server:

ruby rpc_server.rb
# => [x] Awaiting RPC requests

To request a fibonacci number run the client:

ruby rpc_client.rb
# => [x] Requesting fib(30)

The design presented here is not the only possible implementation of a RPC service, but it has some important advantages:

• If the RPC server is too slow, you can scale up by just running another one. Try running a second rpc_server.rb in a new console.
• On the client side, the RPC requires sending and receiving only one message. No synchronous calls like Bunny::Channel#queue are required. As a result the RPC client needs only one network round trip for a single RPC request.

Our code is still pretty simplistic and doesn't try to solve more complex (but important) problems, like:

• How should the client react if there are no servers running?
• Should a client have some kind of timeout for the RPC?
• If the server malfunctions and raises an exception, should it be forwarded to the client?
• Protecting against invalid incoming messages (eg checking bounds, type) before processing.

If you want to experiment, you may find the management UI useful for viewing the queues.